SSGAN: Cloud removal in satellite images using spatiospectral generative adversarial network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Satellite data’s reliability, uniformity, and global scanning capabilities have revolutionized agricultural monitoring and crop management. However, the presence of clouds in satellite images can obscure useful information, rendering them difficult to infer. Aiming at the problem of cloud cover, this study presents a SpatioSpectral Generative Adversarial Network (SSGAN) approach for effectively eliminating cloud cover from multispectral satellite images. It utilizes the Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images as complementary information with the optical images from the Sentinel-2 satellite. The proposed model exploits feature extraction by sub-grouping the 13 channels of Sentinel-2 images based on their electromagnetic wavelength. Experimentally, we demonstrated that the proposed SSGAN model surpasses conventional and state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods and can reconstruct regions obscured by clouds. The subgrouping optimized the utilization of sensor information and improved the performance metrics for reconstructed images. Compared to the state-of-the-art (SOTA) approach, the SSGAN model demonstrates higher performance, achieving a mPSNR of 32.771, mSSIM of 0.880, and correlation coefficient (CC) of 0.889. The SSGAN model was further evaluated under varying conditions, including scenarios without the inclusion of SAR data, where it achieved a mPSNR of 26.825, mSSIM of 0.726, and CC of 0.615. Adding SAR images into the model significantly enhanced its performance, resulting in a mPSNR of 29.932, mSSIM of 0.857, and CC of 0.735. These results indicate that higher mPSNR, mSSIM, and CC values correspond to better image reconstruction quality. Our method enhances the usability of satellite data for crop mapping, crop health monitoring, and crop yield prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".