Quantum-Enhanced DRL Optimization for DoA Estimation and Task Offloading in ISAC Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work proposes a quantum-aided deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework designed to enhance the accuracy of direction-of-arrival (DoA) estimation and the efficiency of computational task offloading in integrated sensing and communication systems. Traditional DRL approaches face challenges in handling high-dimensional state spaces and ensuring convergence to optimal policies within complex operational environments. The proposed quantum-aided DRL framework that operates in a military surveillance system exploits quantum computing’s parallel processing capabilities to encode operational states and actions into quantum states, significantly reducing the dimensionality of the decision space. For the very first time in literature, we propose a quantum-enhanced actor-critic method, utilizing quantum circuits for policy representation and optimization. Through comprehensive simulations, we demonstrate that our framework improves DoA estimation accuracy by 91.66% and 82.61% over existing DRL algorithms with faster convergence rate, and effectively manages the trade-off between sensing and communication and by optimizing task offloading decisions under stringent ultra-reliable low-latency communication requirements. Comparative analysis also reveals that our approach reduces the overall task offloading latency by 43.09% and 32.35% compared to the DRL-based deep deterministic policy gradient and proximal policy optimization algorithms, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".