Vida acadêmica, o sofrimento psíquico e o uso de psicotrópicos entre mulheres universitárias na UFSC, Brasil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A relação entre violências de gênero, sofrimento psíquico e uso de medicamentos se faz urgente. Cada vez mais temos acesso a notícias de casos de assédio moral e sexual dentro das universidades brasileiras e endossamos os estudos que tratam dos sofrimentos causados por essas violências. Entendemos que esses recorrentes assédios expressam o que Bourdieu chama de violência simbólica e transforma radicalmente a vida pessoal e profissional das mulheres. A partir de entrevistas semiestruturadas, pudemos verificar o poder e também a hierarquia institucional presente nos assédios tratados. Além da dominação masculina, a vida acadêmica das mulheres é atravessada pela necessidade, imposta pelo neoliberalismo, de serem empreendedoras de si, conforme assinala Laval. O que decorre é a busca por agentes externos (medicamentos) que estimulam o autocontrole, gerenciamento de si, produtividade e sucesso. O uso de psicofármacos, e o discurso de auto responsabilização tiram das instituições qualquer responsabilidade com o adoecimento mental, pois ressignifica os problemas sociais como deficiências individuais, físicas e assim, remediáveis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".