Positive masculinity programmes and sexual and reproductive health behaviours among boys and men in poor urban settlements in Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, and Rwanda
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As Positive Masculinity (PM) Programmes continue to develop globally, it is important to examine their role in Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) outcomes. This multi-country qualitative study was conducted using in-depth interviews (IDI) and focus group discussions (FGDs) with community members, beneficiaries and implementers of PM programmes. The findings show that PM programmes are designed using a gender lens to make boys and men more aware and conscious of harmful masculinity traits and their effect on SRHR. The beneficiaries of the interventions report imbibing positive SRHR behaviours by being sexually responsible – upholding sexual rights, taking precautions against sexually transmitted Infections (STIs) and learning proper communication with their partners. They also report acting as vanguards of positive gender norms to their families and peers. Although there are challenges in implementing PM programmes, the results of the study suggest that interventions targeting boys and men hold promise for improving boys' and men’s health behaviours and promoting gender equality in poor urban settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".