Lateral hypopharyngectomy with laryngeal preservation reconstructed with inlay fascio-cutaneous free flaps: clinical and functional outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Lateral hypopharyngectomy (LH) is one of the organ-preservation surgical strategies available for treatment of selected naïve early squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), as well as for rarer non-SCC tumours and persistent/recurrent/second primaries after chemoradiation of the lateral wall of the piriform sinus. Its reconstructive methods have been the subject of different approaches without a general consensus. The aim of the present study is to describe a retrospective series of LH reconstructed by inlay fascio-cutaneous free flaps, reporting on oncological and functional outcomes. Methods: Patients who underwent LH at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery of the University of Brescia, Italy, between 2017 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical history, tumour histotype, postoperative complications, functional, and oncological outcomes were collected. Results: Seven patients (6 males, 1 female) were included. In all, 29% had a treatment-naïve neoplasm, while 71% had recurrent disease. The final histology included 3 SCC, 2 synovial sarcomas, one liposarcoma, and one single-site mucosal metastasis from cutaneous melanoma. Negative margins were achieved in 6 patients (86%). All patients had swallowing rehabilitation by speech therapists and were able to safely eat a free diet at discharge, except for one who needed a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy to support nutritional oral intake. After a mean follow-up of 34.3 months, all patients except one are alive. Conclusions: Our study showed that, in selected cases, it is possible to radically remove lateral hypopharyngeal tumours with laryngeal preservation and free flaps inlay reconstruction, with a low rate of complications and acceptable functional and oncological results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".