Effectiveness of a Single Intra-articular Injection of High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronic Acid Versus NSAIDs on the Visual Analog Pain Scale and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Scores in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a single intra-articular injection of high-molecular-weight (HMW) hyaluronic acid (HA) at a dose of 4 mL/60 mg to reduce pain in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA) over 12 months. METHODOLOGY: This retrospective study was conducted after obtaining ethical approval from Dhaka Medical College and Hospital, Bangladesh. From July 2020 to June 2021, a medical professional conducted the investigation. The investigation encompassed patients aged 40 to 70 hospitalized at our facility and diagnosed with Grade 2 or Grade 3 knee OA according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading method. We divided the patients into two categories based on the treatments they received. Patients in Group A received a single injection of HMW HA (60 mg/4 mL) into the joint, along with instructions on activities of daily living, exercise, and painkillers. Group B patients received conservative therapy, which involved the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), muscle relaxants, therapeutic exercises, and a knee brace during physical activity. RESULTS: This study compared the efficacy of a single injection of HMW HA in the joint versus NSAIDs for managing OA-related symptoms over 12 weeks. The HA group initially scored similarly to the comparison group. By week three, however, the group receiving HA had considerably higher Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (p=0.019). This pattern continued through weeks 6 (p=0.044), 9 (p=0.016), and 12 (p<0.001). Similarly, by week 3 (p=0.029), the visual analog scale (VAS) scores, which were initially identical (p=0.120), demonstrated a significant preference for HA, and this preference persisted through weeks 6, 9, and 12 (all p<0.001). The results show that by the third week, HA is more effective than NSAIDs at relieving pain and improving symptoms. CONCLUSION: The study's results indicated that over 12 weeks, the use of HMW HA led to statistically significant reductions in pain intensity, as measured by the VAS. Furthermore, HMW HA demonstrated a more significant improvement in WOMAC ratings, which assess physical function, stiffness, and pain, compared to NSAIDs. The findings suggest that administering HMW HA injections can significantly reduce symptoms and improve functionality in individuals with knee OA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".