Artificial antigen-presenting cell system reveals CD28’s role in modulating T cell functions during human immunodeficiency virus infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
T cell immune dysfunction is a prominent feature of chronic HIV infection. To evaluate non-specific dysfunction, a method involving both generic activation and T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation is necessary. We created a tunable artificial antigen-presenting cell (aAPC) system. This system consists of lipid bilayers on cytometry-compatible silica microbeads (5 μm). When only anti-CD3 is incorporated, T cell activation is limited. Introducing anti-CD28 agonists significantly elevates the cytokine expression and upregulation of activation-induced markers. CD28 co-stimulation modulates the response profile, preferentially promoting IL-2 expression relative to other cytokines. aAPCs-stimulated CD4 + and CD8 + T cells from untreated HIV-infected individuals exhibit altered effector functions and diminished CD28 dependence. These functions are skewed toward TNFα, IFNγ and CD107a, with reduced IL-2. Antiretroviral therapy partially normalizes this distorted profile in CD4 + T cells, but not in CD8 + T cells. Our findings show T cell intrinsic biases that may contribute to persistent systemic T cell dysfunction associated with HIV pathogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".