Spectra of well‐differentiated neuroendocrine lesions in the extrahepatic biliary system: a case series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) occurring in the extrahepatic biliary system are exceedingly rare. While NETs typically manifest as mass lesions, the occurrence of microscopic neuroendocrine cell proliferation without a distinct mass remains undocumented at this location. This study aims to characterise the clinicopathological features of a series of well-differentiated neuroendocrine lesions involving the extrahepatic biliary tree, including mass forming NETs and microscopic non-mass-forming neuroendocrine cell proliferation, designated neuroendocrine cell micronests (NCMs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Surgical resections of NETs/NCMs involving the extrahepatic bile ducts and gallbladder were identified from electronic pathology databases among seven institutions spanning from January 2011 to September 2023. Clinical and histological findings were recorded. Ten patients (four female, six male: age range = 34-75 years) were included in the study. Histopathological examination revealed visible mass-forming lesions in four cases (1.6-14.0 cm in size), identified in the gallbladder (n = two) or extrahepatic bile duct (n = two), all diagnosed as well-differentiated NETs. The remaining six cases revealed incidental non-mass-forming NCMs in either the cystic duct (n = two), common bile duct (n = three) or gallbladder (n = one), ranging from < 0.1 to 0.4 cm; four were associated with biliary lithiasis. No evidence of metastasis or recurrence was seen in the follow-up period (range = 0.1-11.2 years). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the spectrum of extrahepatic biliary well-differentiated neuroendocrine lesions, ranging from incidental microscopic NCMs to grossly apparent mass-forming NETs, potentially requiring different clinical management. Noteworthy is the frequent association of incidental microscopic neuroendocrine cell proliferations with biliary lithiasis, indicating a potential neuroendocrine metaplastic pathogenesis that merits further exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".