MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402533290 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.605

PSVI-12 Clodronate does not impact bone optical density or lameness in juvenile, exercised Quarter Horses

2024· article· en· W4402533290 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brittany L Paris, Jessica L Leatherwood, Thomas H. Welsh, K.G. Glass, Carolyn E. Arnold, Matthew B Conrad, James M George, Rafael E Martinez, Aimée C. Colbath, Brian D. Nielsen, Amanda N Bradbery

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLamenessJuvenileQuarter (Canadian coin)MedicineAnimal scienceBiologySurgeryGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The non-nitrogenous bisphosphonate clodronate disodium (CD) inhibits bone resorption and is approved for horses ≥ 4 yr of age. Extra-label use in juvenile exercising horses is a concern due to potential interference with normal bone growth and development. The objective was to determine the effects of single and repeated doses of CD on bone optical density (radiographic bone aluminum equivalence; RBAE) and lameness score (LS) in juvenile, exercising horses. Quarter Horses [n = 32 (16 geldings, 16 fillies); 500 ± 13 d of age; body weight (BW) = 336 ± 26 kg]) were used to test the hypothesis that horses receiving CD would have greater RBAE and reduced LS, and additional doses of CD would accentuate these effects. In a 168-d trial, horses were housed in individual stalls, and fed 1% BW/d concentrate and ad libitum Coastal bermudagrass hay. Horses were exercised 5 d/wk following a phase-based progressive workload using a free stall exerciser; Phase I (d 0 to 84) mimicked sales preparation whereas Phase II (d 85 to 168) simulated early training. Horses were stratified by age, BW, sex, and initial RBAE into control (CON; n = 8), single dose CD (1X; d 84; n = 8), 2-doses CD (2X; d 0 and d 84; n = 8), and four-doses CD (4X; d 0, d 42, d 84, d 126; n = 8). On injection d (0, 42, 84, and 126), horses were administered either 1.8 mg/kg BW CD (OSPHOS) or isovolumetric saline. On d 0, 84, and 168, dorsal-palmar and lateral-medial radiographs of the left third metacarpus and metatarsus were captured. An aluminum step wedge was included in each image and raw images were analyzed (Quantity One Basic, BioRad) to determine total bone RBAE at 1 cm distal to the nutrient foramen. On d 0 and d 168, horses were evaluated by a veterinarian unaware of treatment group and assigned a LS according to the American Association of Equine Practitioners Lameness Scale. The RBAE and LS data were analyzed via PROC MIXED and PROC GENMOD, respectively, in SAS. For each view, RBAE increased from d 0 to d 84 and remained increased to d 168 (P ≤ 0.02), regardless of treatment, likely due to progressing exercise protocol. On d 0, 29 horses were LS 0, 1 horse was LS 1, and 2 horses were LS 2; LS did not differ among treatment groups (P = 0.61). On d 168, 5 horses were LS 0, 13 horses were LS 2, 11 horses were LS 3, and 1 horse was LS 4; LS did not differ among treatments (P = 0.16). Based on these results, the hypothesis that single or repeated CD administration would increase RBAE and decrease lameness in juvenile, exercised Quarter Horses was rejected. Funding: AFRI#2021-67015-34079

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicBone health and treatments→French-language works237,207→