MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402533373 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.514

PSX-6 Genome-wide association study on hippocampal biomarkers of cumulative affective experience in chicken layers

2024· article· en· W4402533373 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay Neuert, V.R. Osborne, Elena A. Armstrong, Timothy Boswell, Tom V. Smulders, Christine F. Baes, Bayode O. Makanjuola

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHippocampal formationAssociation (psychology)BiologyGenome-wide association studyPsychologyGeneticsNeuroscienceGenotypeSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recurring stress, which can be termed a negative cumulative affective experience has numerous detrimental phenotypic impacts on poultry welfare. Consequently, this negative experience could lead to reduced productivity. Biomarkers that serve as indicators of cumulative affective experience have been found through the density of highly plastic neurons in the hippocampus. There is limited published research on biomarkers of cumulative affective experience in poultry. Therefore, identifying genomic regions associated with the biomarkers of poultry susceptible or resistant to the negative affective experience could aid in creating more efficient and sustainable farming practices. For this study, H&N and Hy-Line Brown hens (n = 42) housed in a multi-tier free range and enriched cage system, respectively, were available. All hens were genotyped with a proprietary 200K SNP panel and phenotypic data were collected from brain tissue sections stained using an antibody to doublecortin (DCX), which was used to quantify densities of highly plastic neurons in the hippocampus. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was used to detect genomic regions associated with biomarkers of cumulative affective experience in poultry. The GWAS results found a total of 19 regions from 8 chromosomes with a comparatively high proportion of genetic variance explained, which is associated with the cumulative affective experience. From these regions, 39 different genes were found to be within 100 kb upstream and downstream of the identified regions. These genes were examined for their biological function and role in the cumulative affective experience. The identified genes are associated with cellular processes and genetic information processing. Of the genes, PIKR6, VPS37D, STX1A, BAZ1B, HGH1, MAF, MAPK15, PIT54 were identified as important candidate genes for the cumulative affective experience. Notably, the identified gene, PIK3R6, overlapped with previously reported genes for the stress response in chickens. These identified genes with association to the hippocampal neural density serve as potential candidate genes underlying the cumulative affective experience in poultry. This study shows that genomic regions associated with cumulative affective experience can be detected and help to provide insight into the genetic architecture of the trait.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207