MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402533375 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.790

PSII-23 Egg production and quality in older Lohmann LSL lite hens in response to rearing space allowance and provision of omega-3 fatty acids and yeast bioactives from placement through to 17 wk of age

2024· article· en· W4402533375 on OpenAlexaff
JunHyung Lee, Veronica Cheng, Elijah G. Kiarie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllowance (engineering)Food scienceBiologyProduction (economics)YeastOmegaAnimal scienceChemistryBiochemistryEconomicsOperations managementMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rearing practices prior to sexual maturity have implications on hen performance. The objective of the current study was to evaluate egg production and quality in Lohmann LSL lite hens reared on low or high spacing allowances (SA) in enriched cages and fed diets with a source of omega-3 fatty acids (n-3 FA) or yeast bioactives (YB) from placement to 17 wk of age (woa). The high and low SA were: 348 cm2/bird; ~50 birds/cage) and 284 cm2/bird; ~68 birds/cage, respectively. The diets provided were control (C), C + 3% co-extruded full fat flaxseed and pulse mixture (FFF; 1:1 wt/wt) for n-3 FA and C + YB, yeast cell walls processed with β-1,3-glucan hydrolase (Tables 1-3). At the beginning of 18 woa, a total of 288 hens were placed in 72 enriched cages (4 hens/cage) based on rearing treatments (n = 12). The hens had ad libitum access to commercial layer diet and water. From 52 to 72 woa, eggs were recorded daily for calculation of hen day egg production (HDEP). Egg weight (EW), shell thickness (EST), shell breaking strength (ESBS), yolk color (YC), and Haugh unit (HU) were analyzed on bi-weekly basis. Egg mass was calculated based on EW and HDEP. Data were subjected to PROC GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with rearing SA, diets, and associated interactions as fixed effects. The cumulative impact of the diets on HDEP did not exhibit significant differences (Table 4). However, the space allowance (SA) demonstrated an effect (P < 0.05) with hens reared in increased SA yielding greater HDEP (98.2 to 94.5%) compared with hens reared in decreased SA (94.0 to 90.8%) at 56, 58, 60, 63 and 71 woa. Furthermore, hens reared in SA exhibited greater HU values (P < 0.05) throughout, although egg weight and mass were not affected (P > 0.05; Table 5-8) by SA. In conclusion, under the conditions of the study, provision of n-3 FA and YB did not present noticeable carryover impact on egg production and quality during the mid to late laying cycle. However, rearing spacing allowance influenced egg production and quality. Suggesting, reducing rearing stress through the provision of higher space allowance prior to sexual maturity had carryover effects on hen productivity in late lay cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207