MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

“If Something Glorious is Desired”: the Establishment of the Academy of Sciences in the Context of the Institutionalization of Political Education in Russia in the First Quarter of the 18th Century

2024· article· ru· W4402533504 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrey V. Topychkanov

Bibliographic record

VenueДиалог со временем · 2024
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAcademic Freedom and Politics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstitutionalisationQuarter (Canadian coin)PoliticsContext (archaeology)Political scienceEconomic historySocial scienceSociologyHistoryLawArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В статье рассматривается процесс институционализации политического образования и политических наук в России первой четверти XVIIIв., завершившийся созданием Академии наук и Академического университета. Первое знакомство с политическим образованием произошло в Славяно-греко-латинской академии и Гимназии Посольского приказа. В ходе коллегиальной реформы предлагалось внедрить политическое и юридическое образование. Данные проекты не были реализованы, однако они определили характер преподавания политики в Академическом университете, который отвечал просветительской программе Петра I, ориентированной в том числе на формирование новой бюрократии, задачам укрепления придворного общества и идеям политико-теологического синтеза. Длительные поиски профессора политики для Академии наук завершились тем, что должность профессора морали и политики (моральной философии) занял Х.Ф. Гросс, который в 1725 г. объявил курс этики «по книге Пуфендорфской, яже о должности человека и гражданина». Таким образом, труды С. фон Пуфендорфа стали основным учебным пособием по политическим наукам в этот период. Заданные Академическим университетом ориентиры надолго определили траекторию развития политического образования в России. The article examines the process of institutionalization of political education and political sciences in Russia in the first quarter of the 18th century. This process finished with the creation of the Academy of Sciences and the Academic University. The first acquaintance with political education took place in the Slavic-Greek-Latin Academy and the Gymnasium of the Posolsky Prikaz (The Chancellery of Foreign Affairs). During the collegial reform, some projects to introduce political and legal education appeared. These projects were not implemented, but they determined the nature of political education at the Academic University, which responded to 1) the educational program by Peter the Great, oriented, among other things, towards the formation of a new bureaucracy, 2) the tasks of strengthening the court society, and 3) the ideas of political and theological synthesis. As a result of long search for a professor of politics for the Academy of Sciences, H.F. Gross took the chair of professor of morals and politics (moral philosophy) and announced in 1725 a course in ethics “according to Pufendorf’s book On the Duty of Man and Citizen.” Thus, the works by S. von Pufendorf became the main textbook on political science in that period. The guidelines set by the Academic University determined the trajectory of development of political education in Russia for a long time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueДиалог со временемSame topicAcademic Freedom and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207