MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402533564 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.824

PSIV-30 Moderate maternal nutrient restriction in beef heifers reduces fetal crown-rump length at day 35 of gestation

2024· article· en· W4402533564 on OpenAlexaff
Mikayla M Faust, Kathlyn M Hauxwell, Alison K Ward, Carl R Dahlen, Rebecca Swanson, Jessie G Syring, Yssi L Entzie, Layla E King, Jennifer L Hurlbert, Joel S Caton

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRumpCrown-rump lengthAnimal scienceGestationBiologyFetusFetal growthBeef cattlePregnancyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract One-carbon metabolite (OCM) supplementation in beef cattle has been shown to be a novel strategy that alters programming outcomes in tissues of the developing fetus. However, information regarding growth changes to the fetus during early gestation is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of OCM supplementation in control-fed or nutrient-restricted pregnant heifers on fetal crown-rump length (CRL) during early gestation. We hypothesized that decreased nutrient availability in the maternal system would impact the growth of the fetus in utero and providing OCM supplementation would restore growth levels in a nutrient restricted environment. Angus crossbred heifers [n = 216; initial body weight (BW) = 365 ± 5.45 kg] across three replicates underwent estrus synchronization and bred via artificial insemination (AI) using female-sexed semen from a single sire. At breeding (d 0), heifers were assigned to treatments in a 2 × 2 factorial design, which included two levels of daily gain; control (CON; +0.45 kg/d gain) or restricted (RES; −0.23 kg/d gain) and supplementation of OCM [+OCM; rumen protected choline (44.4 g/d) and methionine (7.4 g/d) in a ground corn carrier and weekly injections of 320 mg folate and 20 mg vitamin B12] or no supplementation (-OCM; corn carrier and saline injections). Heifers were weighed weekly, and diets were adjusted on a dry matter basis of the total mixed ration to maintain targeted gain. Treatments were maintained through d 63 of gestation in pregnant heifers. Pregnancy diagnosis and fetal CRL was determined via transrectal ultrasonography on d 35. A total of 103 heifers were confirmed pregnant (replicate 1, n = 37; replicate 2, n = 32; replicate 3, n = 34). Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedures of SAS as a 2 × 2 factorial including the effects of two levels of gain, two levels of OCM treatment, replicate, and their two-way and three-way interactions. There were no three-way interactions between gain × treatment × replicate. However, there was a gain × treatment interaction (P ≤ 0.05), in which fetuses from RES heifers with and without OCM supplementation had reduced CRL compared with fetuses from CON heifers that did not receive OCM (14.15 ± 0.21 mm, 13.88 ± 0.21 mm, 14.84 ± 0.21 mm, respectively). Fetal CRL from OCM supplemented CON heifers was similar (P = 0.06) to all other treatments (14.27 ± 0.21 mm). In conclusion, fetuses from RES heifers exhibited a decreased CRL, and OCM supplementation did not mitigate these effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicReproductive Physiology in Livestock→French-language works237,207→