MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402534518 · doi:10.32682/k56xex40

Vo2Max Siswa Sekolah Basket Wirabhakti Lumajang

2024· article· id· W4402534518 on OpenAlexaff
Afaf Syahab, Muhammad Fathur Rohman, Wahyu Eko Widiyanto, Topoyono Topoyono

Bibliographic record

VenueBravo’s Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesehatan · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSports and Physical Education Research
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permainan bolabasket merupakan cabang olahraga yang populer dunia dengan pemain dari berbagai kalangan masyarakat dari remaja sampai dewasa. Permainan bolabasket dengan yang memerlukan intensitas fisik tinggi membutuhkan fisik dan kebugaran yang prima untuk mencapai permainan pada level lebih yang tinggi. Penelitian ini yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui kapasitas aerobik (VO2Max) siswa sekolah basket Wirabhakti Lumajang yang tengah bersiap menuju ajang PERBASI CUP kelompok umur dibawah 15 tahun. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa sekolah basket wirabhakti lumajang belum ada yang masuk kategori unggul. siswa laki-laki sekolah basket Wira Bahkti Lumajang Under 15 tahun yang masuk kategori sangat baik sekali dan sangat baik dengan persentase 0%. Kategori baik sebesar 7%, berkategori cukup sebesar 43% dengan kategori kurang sebesar 14%, dan dengan kategori kurang sekali sebesar 36%. Sedangkan untuk atlet perempuan sekolah basket Wira Bahkti Lumajang Under 15 tahun yang masuk kategori sangat baik sekali,Sangat baik dan baik memperoleh persentase 0%. Kategori cukup sebesar 14%, berkategori kurang sebesar 36%, dan kategori kurang sekali sebesar 50%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBravo’s Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Jasmani dan KesehatanSame topicSports and Physical Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207