MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402540943 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.069

334 Metagenomic- and culture-based characterization of the ocular microbiome in cattle with infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis

2024· article· en· W4402540943 on OpenAlexaff
Samat Amat, Sarah M. Luecke, Devin B. Holman, Muhammad Anas, Gerald L. Stokka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetagenomicsKeratoconjunctivitisMicrobiomeBiologyMicrobiologyIsolation (microbiology)VirologyBioinformaticsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pinkeye, clinically known as infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK), is one of the most highly contagious diseases impacting cattle at all ages. Despite extensive use of antibiotics and vaccines targeting Moraxella bovis, the primary IBK pathogen, the incidence of pinkeye has been increasing in North American beef cow-calf operations. This highlights the incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease and the need for novel and alternative approaches to control IBK. The objectives of this study were to: 1) characterize the ocular microbiome of beef cattle with and without IBK using shotgun metagenomic sequencing; 2) investigate the genetic diversity of M. bovis, Moraxella bovoculi, and commensal ocular bacterial isolates; 3) evaluate whether selected ocular probiotic candidate strains inhibit Moraxella pathogen growth in the presence of the ocular microbiome in culture using qPCR. A total of 143 ocular swabs were collected from cattle with (n = 102) or without IBK (n = 42) and before antibiotic treatment from beef herds across North Dakota, USA. Fifty samples from IBK (n = 38) and healthy cattle (n = 12) were also subjected to shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Seven bacterial species were relatively more abundant (P < 0.05) in the healthy cattle ocular microbiome including Bifidobacterium globosum, Bacillus licheniformis, Pasteurella multocida, Ruminococcus sp900316555, and Ruminococcus sp900100595. Arthrobacter luteus was the only bacterial species significantly associated with IBK-affected cattle. From the metagenomes, 37 high-quality dereplicated metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) were recovered, nearly a third of which were identified as Mesomycoplasma bovoculi (n = 10). M. bovis (n = 5) and M. bovoculi (n = 13) were also isolated from the ocular swabs of both healthy and IBK-affected cattle. These isolates represented 9 M. bovoculi and 5 M. bovis strains (average nucleotide identity < 99.99%). We also isolated and sequenced several potentially beneficial bacterial species from healthy cattle including Bacillus pumilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, Lentilactobacillus buchneri, Levilactobacillus brevis, and Weizmannia coagulans. Four of these probiotic candidates were also tested for their inhibitory effects against M. bovoculi in co-culture with the ocular microbiome after 24 h incubation using qPCR. The B. pumilus, L. buchneri, L. plantarum, and W. coagulans strains, as well as a mixture of all four isolates, significantly reduced the growth of Moraxella. In summary, our results provide important information on the culturable and non-culturable fraction of the bovine ocular microbiome potentially associated with IBK and suggest that certain bacterial species in the eye may inhibit the growth of Moraxella spp.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicOcular Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207