PSLBII-17 Supplementation with organic versus inorganic selenium during pregnancy to support ewe and lamb health
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Selenium (Se) is essential for optimal ovine health and production, and sheep raised on Se-deficient soils can be vulnerable to Se deficiencies that can affect immune function. Organic or inorganic forms of Se supplementation can remedy these consequences. While inorganic Se is less costly, organic Se is more bioavailable and may be more efficient in providing Se to ewes and lambs. The objectives of this study were to determine how organic versus inorganic Se supplementation affects ewe Se status, Se transfer from ewes to lambs, and the antibody-mediated immune response and dermal hypersensitivity response (DHR) of ewes and their lambs. Dorset-Rideau ewes (n = 100) were enrolled in a randomized complete block design study. From gestation d (gd) 110 to postpartum d (ppd) 50, ewes were fed either a Se-deficient diet and supplemented with no Se, 0.3 mg inorganic Se, or 0.3 mg or 0.6 mg organic Se. Sera were collected on gd 110, 130, 140, and ppd 10 and 50 to determine ewe Se status. On gd 110 and 120, ewes received an intramuscular injection of 0.5 mg ovalbumin (OVA) antigen, and on gd 130 the DHR to OVA was assessed by measuring change in skinfold thickness 0, 6, 24 and 48 h post intradermal injection. To measure the transfer of Se from ewe to lamb, a subset of lambs was euthanized at ppd 10, and longissimus dorsi muscle samples were collected and analyzed for Se content. On ppd 20 and 30, lambs received an intramuscular injection of 0.5 mg hen egg white lysozyme (HEWL) antigen, and on ppd 40 the DHR to HEWL was assessed using the aforementioned protocol. Analysis of ewe sera showed a positive correlation between organic Se supplementation and greater Se concentrations (P < 0.01). Moreover, statistical analyses of the DHR results using a generalized least squares linear model (RStudio) indicate that Se supplementation increased the immune response compared with the non-supplemented ewes (P < 0.01). However, no significant differences between organic and inorganic Se supplementation were found. In lambs, greater ewe Se supplementation resulted in greater Se muscle content (P > 0.01). and organic Se supplementation to ewes significantly increased lamb Se muscle content compared with inorganic Se supplementation (P > 0.01). Finally, analyses of the lamb DHR showed that maternal organic Se supplementation improved the lamb immune response compared with the control group (P > 0.05). Therefore, organic Se supplementation optimally enhances ewe and lamb Se status and their adaptive immune response compared with the inorganic and control groups. This knowledge will guide optimal ewe Se-supplementation choices during pregnancy and postpartum, thus promoting lamb and ewe health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".