PSVII-23 Discriminating meat from different Canadian cattle feeding systems by visible and near-infrared spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Labeling of meat products is key to guarantee quality and origin. Rising production costs and an increase in world trade are leading to an on-going growth of meat fraud. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of visible and near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy to discriminate meat from different Canadian cattle feeding systems. Steers (n = 45) were randomly assigned to three feeding systems: barley (n = 15), corn (n = 15) or grass-fed (n = 15). At 72 h postmortem, Vis-NIR spectra were collected on a) the longissimus thoracis (LT) muscle between the 12th and 13th ribs after 20 min of blooming (intact lean), and b) the adjacent subcutaneous fat from each in-bone ribeye. Afterwards, a steak from the anterior side of the striploin was collected and frozen at -20°C until analysis. After thawing at 4°C overnight, the striploin steak was ground and spectra were collected (ground meat). Four spectral replicates were acquired from each tissue sample with a portable LabSpec4 Standard-Res spectrometer (380–2,500 nm; 1 nm-bandwidth). The absorbances of the visible (Vis), near-infrared (NIR), and both regions combined (Vis-NIR) were later imported into the software PLS_Toolbox 9.3. under MATLAB R2023b. After the application of several mathematical pre-processing treatments, Partial Least Square-Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) discriminant approaches were performed. For the intact tissue, the best results were obtained using the Vis-NIR region with a combination of 2ndderivative+smoothing+mean center, and a PLS-DA with 6 latent variables (LV). This approach correctly classified 100% of the meat samples from each feeding group, with an area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 1 in cross-validation (CV). Likewise, 100% of the fat samples from each feeding system were correctly classified in CV, using only the Vis region and 2ndderivative+smoothing+mean center by PLS-DA (5 LV and AUROCCV = 1). For ground meat, both PLS-DA (Vis, smoothing + mean center, 6 LV, AUROCCV = 1 or Vis-NIR, mean scatter correction, 6 LV, AUROCCV = 1) and SVM (Vis-NIR, smoothing + standard normal variate) correctly classified 100% of the samples from barley, corn and grass-fed in CV. The classification was successful only considering the Vis region due to the high homogenization of these samples. For fat, the significant variable importance in projection (VIP) scores were found at 423 to 612 nm, where carotenoids absorb energy. This would explain the accuracy of the Vis region for the classification of the fat samples. For intact and ground meat, significant VIP scores were found in both the Vis region, due to the myoglobin absorption, and NIR region (1,796 to 1,900 nm), due to the vibration of the hydrocarbon bonds from fatty acids. Hence, these results showed the potential of Vis-NIR spectroscopy to authenticate either fat, intact lean or ground meat from cattle fed different diets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".