MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402541673 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.172

514 Roles of core regulatory noncoding RNAs in bovine <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> subclinical mastitis

2024· article· en· W4402541673 on OpenAlexaffabout
Faith A. Omonijo, Mengqi Wang, David Gagné, Mario Laterrière, Xin Zhao, Eveline M. Ibeagha‐Awemu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaphylococcus aureusSubclinical infectionMastitisBiologyMicrobiologyVirologyBacteriaGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is an opportunistic pathogen frequently associated with subclinical mastitis and accounts for a large proportion of the economic losses due to mastitis on Canadian dairy farms. Despite a plethora of investigations on the molecular mechanisms of mastitis, little information is available on the roles of regulatory noncoding RNAs (ncRNA). This study aimed to uncover the regulatory roles of microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the response to subclinical mastitis due to S. aureus of cows. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq and miRNA-Seq) was conducted on milk somatic cells from 13 cows with S. aureus subclinical mastitis [high somatic cell counts (SCC) of ≥350,000 cells/mL for ≥3 consecutive months and positive for S. aureus only], and 5 healthy cows (low SCC< 100,000 cells/mL for ≥3 consecutive months and negative for mastitis pathogens). RNASeq and smRNASeq nf-core bioinformatics pipelines were used to process the data. Results showed that 97 miRNAs (36 up-regulated and 61 down-regulated) and 1,565 lncRNAs (617 up-regulated and 948 down-regulated) were differentially expressed (DE; FDR< 0.05) between S. aureus subclinical mastitic cows and healthy controls. Competing endogenous networks comprising co-expressed differentially expressed mRNAs (DEGs), miRNAs (DEMs), and lncRNAs (DELs) were constructed. CytoHubba, a Cytoscape plugin, was utilized to identify the top hub regulatory ncRNAs including bta-miR-2387, bta-miR-331, bta-miR-95, bta-miR-744, bta-miR-455, bta-novel-miR-60, bta-miR-3533, bta-miR-500, bta-miR-1249 and bta-novel-miR-66). The results revealed that the main hubs (downregulated bta-miR-2387 and upregulated bta-miR-331) potentially regulate numerous DEGs during S. aureus subclinical mastitis such as NFKB1, IL10RA, IL17RA, TLR10, LOC112442665, LOC112448481 and LOC112442015, etc., and TUNAR, LOC112445429, LOC112444484 and LOC101907369, respectively. Functional analysis of bta-miR-331 target genes revealed roles in several KEGG pathways (e.g., tight junction, bacterial invasion of epithelial cells) and biological processes gene ontology (GO) terms (e.g., cell adhesion, cell locomotion and cell motility). Similarly, roles for bta-miR-2387 in KEGG pathways like JAK-STAT signaling pathway, NOD-like receptor signaling pathway and inflammatory bowel disease, and biological process GO terms such as inflammatory response, neutrophil migration, leucocyte migration and response to cytokine were revealed. MiR-331 has been found to promote cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast cancer. Furthermore, bta-miR-2387 has been shown to regulate several immune pathways which aid in improving the movement of spermatids across the epithelium and preleptotene spermatocytes across the blood-testis barrier during spermatogenesis. This supports our findings and suggests that bta-miR-2387 and bta-miR-331 could be pivotal regulators of immune-related genes and pathways during S. aureus subclinical mastitis. Thus, they hold potential as biomarkers for the development of therapeutic and diagnostic tools for managing subclinical mastitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicMycobacterium research and diagnosis→French-language works237,207→