MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402541975 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae234.697

PSVII-13 Influence of early maternal gestational body weight gain on liver gene expression across generations in offspring

2024· article· en· W4402541975 on OpenAlexaff
Germán Darío Ramírez-Zamudio, Carl R Dahlen, Friederike Baumgaertner, Ana Clara B Menezes, Jennifer L Hurlbert, Kerri A Bochantin-Winders, Sarah R Underdahl, Kacie L McCarthy, Lawrence P. Reynolds, Alison K Ward, Pawel P. Borowicz, Kevin K. Sedivec, J. S. Caton, Wellison Jarles Silva Da Diniz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffspringBiologyBody weightWeight gainAndrologyPregnancyGene expressionGeneGestationPhysiologyEndocrinologyGeneticsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Maternal nutrition in the periconceptional period influences gene regulation in the fetal liver across generations, affecting long-term metabolism. This study aimed to examine the effects of the rate of body weight (BW) gain of the dam (F0) during early gestation on the differential gene expression of the liver of first (F1) and second-generation (F2) offspring. Crossbred Angus heifers (F0) were assigned into two groups based on their targeted rate of BW gain during the first 84 d of gestation: low gain (LG; 0.28 kg/d; n = 8) or moderate gain (MG; 0.79 kg/d; n = 8). Following this period, all heifers (F0) were kept on a forage-based diet until the F1 offspring were weaned at 8 mo. The F1 heifers underwent estrus synchronization and were artificially inseminated at 15 mo of age. Liver samples were obtained from the F1 heifers at birth and later when harvested at 84 d of gestation, along with liver samples from their F2 fetuses, for a comprehensive multigenerational RNA-Seq analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the DESeq2 R-package, focusing on significant genes determined by a P-value ≤ 0.05 and a log2 fold change |0.5|. Metabolic pathways and biological processes were analyzed using the WebGestalt tool to understand the implications of the observed gene expression changes. At birth, F1 heifers from MG dams exhibited 281 DEGs, comprising 152 downregulated and 129 upregulated genes compared with the offspring of LG dams. These genes were over-represented in lipid metabolism, cellular homeostasis, and signaling pathways, such as MAPK and chemokine signaling. At harvest, 159 DEGs were identified in F1 heifers, with 67 genes downregulated and 92 genes upregulated in the MG group. These genes were related to cellular morphogenesis and biogenesis processes, with a notable downregulation of metabolic pathways. For the F2 fetuses, 192 DEGs were identified, where 71 genes were downregulated, and 121 genes were upregulated. These genes were involved in biological functions such as peptide secretion to cell proliferation and signaling pathways, including PI3K-Akt and Hippo signaling. The analysis of DEGs shared between F1 heifers and F2 fetuses highlighted the influence of the moderate BW weight gain of the F0 dams. At birth and harvest, F1 heifers shared three genes (NAV2, FAM131C, SH3D21). F1 heifers at birth and F2 fetuses shared five genes (CD3E, H1-12, SLC7A11, PIP4P2, ENSBTAG00000051730). From the harvest at d 84 in F1 heifers and F2 fetuses, five genes were shared (DCDC2, RIN1, ENSBTAG00000008911, ENSBTAG00000040518, ENSBTAG00000048049). No DEGs were shared across all comparisons. These findings emphasize the multigenerational impact of early gestational BW gain of the dam on liver gene expression, influencing metabolic pathways and signaling across generations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→