DrugMAP 2.0: molecular atlas and pharma-information of all drugs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The escalating costs and high failure rates have decelerated the pace of drug development, which amplifies the research interests in developing combinatorial/repurposed drugs and understanding off-target adverse drug reaction (ADR). In other words, it is demanded to delineate the molecular atlas and pharma-information for the combinatorial/repurposed drugs and off-target interactions. However, such invaluable data were inadequately covered by existing databases. In this study, a major update was thus conducted to the DrugMAP, which accumulated (a) 20831 combinatorial drugs and their interacting atlas involving 1583 pharmacologically important molecules; (b) 842 repurposed drugs and their interacting atlas with 795 molecules; (c) 3260 off-targets relevant to the ADRs of 2731 drugs and (d) various types of pharmaceutical information, including diverse ADMET properties, versatile diseases, and various ADRs/off-targets. With the growing demands for discovering combinatorial/repurposed therapies and the rapidly emerging interest in AI-based drug discovery, DrugMAP was highly expected to act as an indispensable supplement to existing databases facilitating drug discovery, which was accessible at: https://idrblab.org/drugmap/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.062 | 0.039 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".