Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dick came home to Australia in September 1961 with little luggage and no notion of how to bring together the practicalities of art in Sydney with the ideas milling around in his head.Events moved swiftly for him.He stayed with his mother for a short while.Then, with Harry married to Joyce and living in her apartment at 16/30 Blues Point Road, McMahons Point, Joyce arranged for him to have the use of the small, dark boiler room in the building's basement as a studio.Outside there was a splendid view across the harbour (Plate 2.1).Noela Yuill, who had lived with her children in the apartment block since 1956, was told by Joyce that her stepson needed somewhere apart from the tiny boiler room where he could stand back to view his work or show paintings to prospective clients.Yuill offered the use of her flat. 1 That generous gesture turned out to benefit her as well as the artist.Dick's art got under Noela's skin, as she discovered when he sold a painting and she and her sons found they missed its presence on the wall.On reflection, she told me, she must have been mentally prepared for the arrival of art in her domain: At Edinburgh when I was young, I saw an exhibition of [Paul] Gauguin's paintings and loved it.Then I lived in London, in Canada, and back in Australia, not looking at art much.When I encountered Dick's art, it connected with the way I had responded to Gauguin-the same vitality and power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.152 | 0.055 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".