Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dick came home to Australia in September 1961 with little luggage and no notion of how to bring together the practicalities of art in Sydney with the ideas milling around in his head.Events moved swiftly for him.He stayed with his mother for a short while.Then, with Harry married to Joyce and living in her apartment at 16/30 Blues Point Road, McMahons Point, Joyce arranged for him to have the use of the small, dark boiler room in the building's basement as a studio.Outside there was a splendid view across the harbour (Plate 2.1).Noela Yuill, who had lived with her children in the apartment block since 1956, was told by Joyce that her stepson needed somewhere apart from the tiny boiler room where he could stand back to view his work or show paintings to prospective clients.Yuill offered the use of her flat. 1 That generous gesture turned out to benefit her as well as the artist.Dick's art got under Noela's skin, as she discovered when he sold a painting and she and her sons found they missed its presence on the wall.On reflection, she told me, she must have been mentally prepared for the arrival of art in her domain:At Edinburgh when I was young, I saw an exhibition of [Paul] Gauguin's paintings and loved it.Then I lived in London, in Canada, and back in Australia, not looking at art much.When I encountered Dick's art, it connected with the way I had responded to Gauguin-the same vitality and power.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it