MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract C043: Hyperinsulinemia promotes pancreatic cancer progression by altering tumor metabolism

2024· article· en· W4402551843 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey S. Lin, James D. Johnson, David J. Schaeffer, Vincent R. Richard, Christoph H. Borchers, Janel L. Kopp

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperinsulinemiaCancerPancreatic cancerMedicineInternal medicineCancer researchEndocrinologyMetabolismInsulinInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metabolic diseases, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D), insulin resistance, and obesity, often accompany pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and they are associated with reduced survival. Hyperinsulinemia is a common hallmark symptom shared by those disorders and is independently associated with reduced survival of PDAC patients. While it has been established that endogenous hyperinsulinemia accelerates PDAC initiation by promoting the formation of KRAS-driven pre-cancerous lesions, its role in the progression of established tumors remains poorly understood. This represents a major knowledge gap in our understanding of whether insulin needs to be monitored and controlled during PDAC treatment, as it is not typically considered in current treatment paradigms. We hypothesized that hyperinsulinemia promotes the progression of PDAC tumors. Using patient-derived PDAC organoids (PDOs) and a mouse model of metabolic disorders, we found that insulin may promote PDOs’ growth by reprogramming tumor metabolism. A High-fat diet (HFD) treatment that induces hyperinsulinemia, but not hyperglycemia in mice accelerated the growth of PDO-derived orthotopic xenografts. Importantly, the fasting insulin level showed a significant positive correlation with the endpoint tumor volume, suggesting that endogenous insulin may positively contribute to PDOs’ growth in vivo. To assess the direct effect of insulin on the growth and molecular profile of PDOs, we treated an early passage PDO line with different concentrations of insulin and glucose at physiologically relevant levels. We observed a ∼1.2-fold increase in cell number after 7 days of culture in high insulin (10 nM) conditions with high (15 mM) or physiological (6 mM) levels of glucose, relative to the low insulin control. Phosphoproteomic analysis demonstrated significantly greater PI3K/AKT/mTOR, but not RAF/MEK/ERK, activity under high insulin with high or physiological levels of glucose compared to the control, directing the investigation toward the metabolic effects of insulin. Consistently, unbiased proteomics profiling revealed that metabolic proteins were significantly enriched in both high insulin conditions, and interestingly insulin enriched different sets of proteins in various metabolic pathways depending on glucose levels. Together, our preliminary results suggest that hyperinsulinemia may enhance the growth and progression of PDAC by altering tumor metabolism to support cell growth. Further experiments are needed to functionally link the insulin-mediated metabolic changes with increased PDO growth, as well as testing the direct effect of endogenous insulin on PDAC cells in vivo. Citation Format: Jeffrey Lin, James D Johnson, David Schaeffer, Vincent Richard, Christoph Borchers, Janel L Kopp. Hyperinsulinemia promotes pancreatic cancer progression by altering tumor metabolism [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr C043.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→