MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402555335 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2024-0075

Effect of Online Training on the Reliability of Assessing Sacroiliac Joint Radiographs in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Randomized, Controlled Study

2024· article· en· W4402555335 on OpenAlexaffvenue
A. E. F. Hadsbjerg, Mikkel Østergaard, Joel Paschke, Raphael Micheroli, Susanne Juhl Pedersen, Adrian Ciurea, Michael J. Nissen, Kristýna Bubová, Stephanie Wichuk, Manouk de Hooge, Simon Krabbe, Ashish Jacob Mathew, Monika Gregová, Marie Wetterslev, Karel Gorican, Karlo Pintarić, Žiga Snoj, Burkhard Möller, Alexander Bernatschek, M. Donzallaz, R. Lambert, Walter P. Maksymowych

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of AlbertaResearch Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSacroiliac jointRandomized controlled trialRadiographyReliability (semiconductor)Physical therapyOrthodonticsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Radiographic assessment of sacroiliac joints (SIJs) according to the modified New York (mNY) criteria is key in the classification of axial spondyloarthritis but has moderate interreader agreement. We aimed to investigate the improvements of the reliability in scoring SIJ radiographs after applying an online real-time iterative calibration (RETIC) module, in addition to a slideshow and video alone. Methods Nineteen readers, randomized to 2 groups (A or B), completed 3 calibration steps: (1) review of manuscripts, (2) review of slideshow and video with group A completing RETIC, and (3) re-review of slideshow and video with group B completing RETIC. The RETIC module gave instant feedback on readers’ gradings and continued until predefined reliability ( ) targets for mNY positivity/negativity were met. Each step was followed by scoring different batches of 25 radiographs (exercises I to III). Agreement ( ) with an expert radiologist was assessed for mNY positivity/negativity and individual lesions. Improvements by training strategies were tested by linear mixed models. Results In exercises I, II, and III, mNY were 0.61, 0.76, and 0.84, respectively, in group A; and 0.70, 0.68, and 0.86, respectively, in group B (ie, increasing, mainly after RETIC completion). Improvements were observed for grading both mNY positivity/negativity and individual pathologies, both in experienced and, particularly, inexperienced readers. Completion of the RETIC module in addition to the slideshow and video caused a significant increase of 0.17 (95% CI 0.07-0.27;P= 0.002) for mNY-positive and mNY-negative grading, whereas completion of the slideshow and video alone did not ( = 0.00, 95% CI −0.10 to 0.10;P= 0.99). Conclusion Agreement on scoring radiographs according to the mNY criteria significantly improved when adding an online RETIC module, but not by slideshow and video alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments→French-language works237,207→