MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Using Advanced Imaging To Evaluate Bone Quality And Relative Energy Deficiency Risk In Elite Athletes

2024· article· en· W4402556526 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emily M. Smith, Paige M. Wyatt, Kelly Drager, Steven K. Boyd, Lauren A. Burt

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Composition Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsCanadian Sport Centre PacificUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElite athletesAthletesEliteQuality (philosophy)MedicinePhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs) is a syndrome observed in athletic populations resulting from long-term low energy availability (LEA). Low bone mineral density (BMD) has emerged as a primary indicator of LEA. Areal BMD (aBMD) is typically assessed using dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Recent advancements to the REDs consensus statement included an updated clinical assessment tool (CAT2). This tool includes aBMD of ≤-1.0 SD at the hip or spine or a loss in aBMD as a primary indicator of REDs risk. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) is an advanced imaging technique able to assess volumetric BMD (vBMD) at the distal radius and tibia. The new REDs consensus statement mentions HR-pQCT as having potential to identify impaired bone health. HR-pQCT allows for the analysis of advanced parameters of vBMD, bone microarchitecture and bone geometry, which may provide additional parameters for identification of REDs risk. PURPOSE: 1) Assess the prevalence of athletes at-risk of REDs using REDs CAT2; 2) Use HR-pQCT to evaluate differences in vBMD, bone microarchitecture and geometry in athletes at-risk vs. not at-risk based on REDs CAT2. METHODS: Participants included 94 athletes (22.8 ± 3.5 years; 51% female) affiliated with the Canadian Sport Institute Calgary in predominantly elite winter sports. The REDs CAT2 was used to identify athletes at-risk and level of risk (none, mild, moderate, high) of REDs. HR-pQCT scans of the non-dominant radius and left tibia were acquired. HR-pQCT total (TtBMD), cortical (CtBMD), and trabecular (TbBMD) vBMD (mg HA/cm3), cortical thickness (CtTh, mm) and area (CtAr, mm2) were assessed. T-tests compared differences between groups. RESULTS: Eleven athletes (12%; n = 6 female) were at mild risk of REDs based on the CAT2. At the tibia, TtBMD (p = 0.004), CtTh (p = 0.004), and CtAr (p = 0.003) were lower in the mild risk group than the no risk group. Similarly, CtAr (p = 0.003) was lower at the radius. CONCLUSION: We found 12% of elite athletes were at mild risk of REDs based on the new CAT2. Using advanced imaging, total vBMD, cortical bone microarchitecture and geometry were lower in athletes at mild risk of REDs. This study agrees with the new consensus statement that HR-pQCT has the potential to identify impaired bone health in athletes at risk of REDs. Student work supported by the funding of the Dr. Cy Frank Trainee Award in Nutrition for Bone, Joint and Muscle Health by the McCaig Institute at the University of Calgary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207