Enhancing Transparent Circularly Polarized Antenna Performance for Automotive Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the impact of the vehicle body on the transparent circularly polarized (CP) antenna’s performance when installed on the vehicle windshield has been investigated. The incorporation of an absorber layer on the vehicle floor to improve the antenna’s performance has been proposed. The study also evaluates how the placement of the antenna on the windshield affects its performance. Utilizing a transparent CP spiral slot antenna operating at 1.227 GHz and 1.575 GHz, the results reveal that the radiation performance of CP antennas on windshields significantly depends on their positioning. Additionally, the vehicle body affects the CP antenna’s radiation pattern and axial ratio (AR). We propose adjusting the antenna’s position and incorporating an absorber layer on the vehicle floor to address these effects. Notably, this absorber layer has the potential to simultaneously improve the performance of multiple antennas mounted on the windshield. The enhancement caused by this layer is verified through full-wave simulations and measurements. The impact of seats and four occupants inside the vehicle on the antenna’s performance in the presence of the absorber layer is also investigated. With the absorber layer and occupants present, the antenna achieves an AR beamwidth of 36° and 31° at 1.227 GHz and 1.575 GHz, respectively, in the <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$y^{\prime}z^{\prime}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-plane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".