An online mindful self-compassion group offered during COVID-19: reflections on group work elements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While self-compassion has enjoyed a long and well-regarded history within the discipline of psychology, its presence within social work remains largely unexplored and poorly understood. This article outlines the development, recruitment, and implementation of a Mindful Self-Compassion group which took place during the COVID-19 pandemic and was co-facilitated by the first and second authors, two university professors (one a social worker and the other a registered dietitian), both recently trained from the Center for Mindful Self-Compassion as teachers in mindful self-compassion. The program was originally developed by Drs. Germer and Neff, key researchers on self-compassion. Drawing from historical and contemporary group work research, reflections on the group stages, member roles, and co-facilitation components are offered, particularly within the context of an online group. Observations on the group’s strengths and challenges are considered as well as suggestions for future offerings of the group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it