Astrocyte glucocorticoid receptors mediate sex-specific changes in activity following stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Interactions between orexin neurons and astrocytes in the lateral hypothalamus influence activity levels including circadian and motivated behaviour. These behaviors are disrupted by stress in rodents and form a hallmark of stress-related neuropsychiatric disorders. Here we set out to understand how stress influences activity and the underlying cellular mechanisms. We report that the long-term effects of stress on activity levels correlate with spontaneous firing of orexin neurons with hyperactivity in males and hypoactivity presented by female mice. These neuronal changes were accompanied by extensive astrocyte remodelling. Causal manipulations identified lateral hypothalamic astrocytes as key regulators of activity patterns. In the context of stress, genetic deletion of glucocorticoid receptors in lateral hypothalamic astrocytes rescued the effects of stress on orexin neuron firing, restoring activity to control levels in both males and females. Overall, these data suggest that astrocytic regulation of orexin neuron firing enables the maintenance of activity levels, and their dysfunction drives stress-induced activity dysregulation. Graphical Abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".