MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402562561 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2156

The <scp>thesan</scp> project: galaxy sizes during the epoch of reionization

2024· article· en· W4402562561 on OpenAlexaff
Xuejian Shen, Mark Vogelsberger, Josh Borrow, Yongao Hu, Rahul Kannan, Aaron Smith, Enrico Garaldi, Lars Hernquist, Takahiro Morishita, Sandro Tacchella, Oliver Zier, Guochao Sun, Anna–Christina Eilers, Hui Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsReionizationGalaxyRedshiftPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We investigate galaxy sizes at redshift $z\gtrsim 6$ with the cosmological radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulation suite thesan(-hr). These simulations simultaneously capture reionization of the large-scale intergalactic medium and resolved galaxy properties. The intrinsic sizes ($r^{\ast }_{1/2}$) of simulated galaxies increase moderately with stellar mass at $M_{\ast } \lesssim 10^{8}{\, \rm M_\odot}$ and decrease fast at larger masses, resulting in a hump feature at $M_{\ast }\sim 10^{8}{\, \rm M_\odot}$ that is insensitive to redshift. Low-mass galaxies are in the initial phase of size growth and are better described by a spherical shell model with feedback-driven outflows competing with the cold inflowing gas streams. In contrast, massive galaxies fit better with the disc formation model. They generally experience a phase of rapid compaction and gas depletion, likely driven by internal disc instability rather than external processes. We identify four compact quenched galaxies in the $(95.5\, {\rm cMpc})^{3}$ volume of thesan-1 at $z\simeq 6$ and their quenching follows reaching a characteristic stellar surface density akin to the massive compact galaxies at cosmic noon. Compared to observations, we find that the median ultraviolet effective radius ($R^{\rm UV}_{\rm eff}$) of simulated galaxies is at least three times larger than the observed ones at $M_{\ast }\lesssim 10^{9}{\, \rm M_\odot}$ or $M_{\rm UV}\gtrsim -20$ at $6 \lesssim z \lesssim 10$. The population of compact galaxies ($R^{\rm UV}_{\rm eff}\lesssim 300\, {\rm pc}$) galaxies at $M_{\ast }\sim 10^{8}{\, \rm M_\odot}$ is missing in our simulations. This inconsistency persists across many other cosmological simulations with different galaxy formation models and demonstrates the potential of using galaxy morphology to constrain physics of galaxy formation at high redshifts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→