MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402564021 · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2024.09.001

Thrombus on Mitral Annular Calcification: A Systematic Review of Management and Outcomes

2024· review· en· W4402564021 on OpenAlexaff
Amber Cintosun, David Belzile, Maala Sooriyakanthan, Ani Orchanian‐Cheff, Wendy Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenueCJC Open · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalcificationThrombusMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineMitral valveRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mitral annular calcification (MAC) is a common chronic degenerative process of the mitral valve. Thrombus formation on MAC is a rare complication that likely contributes to the increased risk of thromboembolic events. Outcomes and management strategies for this condition are unknown. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to describe the management and outcomes of patients who have thrombus on MAC. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Patients with a prior mitral valve intervention or prosthesis were excluded. The primary outcomes were treatment, mortality, and thromboembolic events. Results: Fifteen studies, with a total of 22 cases (patients aged 69.1 ± 14.8 years; n = 18 [82%] female) were included. Most patients presented with stroke or a transient ischemic event (n = 15; 68%) or myocardial infarction (n = 4; 18%). All patients were diagnosed with either transthoracic (n = 18; 82%) or transesophageal (n = 4; 18%) echocardiography. Seventeen patients (77%) were treated with anticoagulation therapy alone, and 5 (23%) required surgery. The most common surgical indication was prevention of recurrent embolization (n = 3; 14%). No mortality was reported. Six patients (27%) had thromboembolic events after diagnosis. For those treated with anticoagulation therapy alone, 5 (23%) had persistent thrombus with or without embolization. Conclusions: In this systematic review, patients with MAC who present with a thromboembolic event require careful echocardiographic assessment of the MAC, to exclude the presence of thrombus. Although most patients can be managed with anticoagulation therapy alone, a significant number will require surgery. Persistent thrombus, despite anticoagulation therapy, and recurrent embolization are common. Larger studies are needed to elucidate what constitutes the optimal long-term care for these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.006
Bibliometrics0.0100.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCJC OpenSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207