MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402567984 · doi:10.3138/jeleu-2024-0171

Laparoscopic renal denervation: A treatment option for management of refractory loin pain

2024· article· en· W4402567984 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jayasimha Abbaraju, Omer Mohamed Abdalla, Ahmed Ghonaimy, Azfer Usmani, Sanjay Kuravinakop, Madhusudhan Mali, Seshadri Sriprasad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endoluminal Endourology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular anomalies and interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryNephrectomyNephrologyDenervationAnesthesiaKidneyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Intractable loin pain is a debilitating condition with a significant impact on the patient's quality of life. Loin pain haematuria syndrome (LPHS) is a disease of exclusion and can be of two subtypes, Primary or Type 2 and secondary or Type 1. The type 1 LPHS could be a result of congenital anomalies, or acquired due infections, trauma, or surgery. Management of these patients can be pharmacological, nerve blocks, renal denervation, auto-transplantation and nephrectomy. Laparoscopic renal denervation (LRDN) has emerged as a minimally invasive surgical procedure, with acceptable results. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent laparoscopic renal denervation in our unit from 2007 to 2022 by a single surgeon were included in this study. The indications for surgical intervention were loin pain refractory to medical therapy in the absence of any physical causes of pain. All patients were assessed by a multidisciplinary team, involving a urologist, a nephrologist, a pain consultant, and a pain psychologist. Baseline and postoperative pain scores of the patients were obtained. The patients underwent splanchnic or coeliac nerve blocks under local anaesthesia and were reviewed in the outpatient clinic post-procedure. If there were an improvement in the pain control and pain scores, they were offered LRDN. During the surgery, the renal vessels and proximal ureter were stripped from the neuronal and lymphatic tissues. Results: The 20 patients included in the study underwent 23 procedures. All patients were female. The mean age was 44 years, and the median follow up was 24 months. The median operating time was 90 minutes, excluding anaesthetic time. There were no significant adverse events other than one patient needed antibiotics for chest infection. There was significant improvement of pain scores with the mean pain scores falling to 2.47 postoperatively from 8.40. Fifty percent of patients had complete resolution of pain, while 30% had significant reduction in use of pain medication. Patients with primary LPHS did not have significant improvement in their pain scores, and one of these patients required auto-transplantation of her kidney.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endoluminal EndourologySame topicVascular anomalies and interventionsFrench-language works237,207