Why Is Generation Z Motivated at Work? A Qualitative Exploration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article aims to identify and explain the factors leading to work motivation among the Generation Z workforce, using the self‐determination theory (SDT) of motivation as a lens. The study involved 317 respondents and utilized open‐ended questions to gather textual responses through a survey. The responses were analyzed using NVIVO 14. Seven broad themes explained this cohort's work motivation: nature of work , job , support , future opportunities , references , experience , and career . The two most autonomous forms of motivation—intrinsic motivation and identified regulation—significantly explain worker motivation. Theoretically, the study's findings advance the SDT of motivation by applying its principles to an emerging workforce. Additionally, these findings enhance our comprehension of Generation Z workers’ motivation across various industries. From a managerial perspective, the results may inform the development of targeted human resource practices aimed at motivating Generation Z employees within organizations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it