Phonological, orthographic and morphological skills are related to structural properties of ventral and motor white matter pathways in skilled and impaired readers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), we assessed the extent to which fractional anisotropy values in the dorsal (i.e., arcuate fasciculus; AF) versus ventral (i.e., inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; IFOF) distinction of structural white matter pathways associated with selected reading processes, could be replicated in skilled adult readers (N = 17) and extended to adults with reading impairments (N = 13). In addition to the AF and IFOF, motor-based tracts (i.e., posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) and the frontal aslant tract (FAT)) were isolated to explore their role in reading performance. Several interesting relationships with reading performance emerged. First, orthographic awareness was related to the left IFOF in skilled readers, whereas orthographic awareness was related to left PLIC for impaired readers. Morphological awareness was related to left FAT for skilled readers, whereas morphological awareness was related to right AF, right IFOF and left PLIC for impaired readers. Overall, these findings support the notion that adult reading performance (both skilled and impaired) is related to the structural properties of the ventral white matter pathways. More consideration should be paid to motor pathways, particularly the PLIC, and their role in compensatory reading strategies in individuals with reading impairments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".