MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

$\mathcal{S}^{3}$1DCNN: A Compact Stacked Spectral-Spatial Attention 1DCNN for Seizure Prediction with Wearables

2024· article· en· W4402572154 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Zhang, Yvon Savaria, Mohamad Sawan, François Leduc-Primeau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWearable computerComputer scienceWearable technologySmartwatchArtificial intelligenceEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seizure prediction has become a crucial field of research that aims to improve the lives of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy by reducing their anxiety and allowing the implementation of precautionary measures. Recently, deep learning has shown remarkable advancements in epilepsy prediction. However, this progress comes with increased computational demands and memory usage, which makes it unsuitable for low-power wearable devices. This work proposes a compact stacked spectral-spatial attention 1DCNN ($S^{3}$1DCNN) leveraging the short-time Fourier transform (STFT). This model aims to enhance the interpretable ability to analyze non-stationary electroencephalography (EEG) signals, making it suitable for implementation in wearable biomedical devices. The results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods, achieving an average sensitivity of 92.1 %, an average false prediction rate (FPR) of 0.0081h, an average area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.980, and an estimated energy consumption of 0.21 µJ per inference on the American Epilepsy Society Seizure Prediction Challenge (AES) dataset. It demonstrates our method's promising application potential in low-power and energy-efficient wearable devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207