Distinct patterns of satDNA distribution in holocentric chromosomes of spike-sedges (<i>Eleocharis</i>, Cyperaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eleocharis R. Br. (Cyperaceae) species are known for having holocentric chromosomes, which enable rapid karyotype differentiation. High intra- and interspecific variations in chromosome numbers and genome sizes are documented for different Eleocharis species, frequently accompanied by fluctuations in the repetitive DNA fraction. However, a lack of detailed analysis has hampered a better understanding of the interplay between holocentricity and repetitive DNA evolution in this genus. In our study, we confirmed the holocentricity of Eleocharis chromosomes by immunostaining against the kinetochore protein KNL1 and the cell-cycle dependent posttranslational modifications histone H2AThr121ph and H3S10ph. We further studied the composition and chromosomal distribution of the main satellite DNA repeats found in the newly sequenced species Eleocharis maculosa, Eleocharis geniculata, Eleocharis parodii, Eleocharis elegans, and Eleocharis montana. Five of the six satellites discovered were arranged in clusters, while EmaSAT14 was distributed irregularly along the chromatid length in a line-like manner. EmaSAT14 monomers were present in a few copies in few species across the Eleocharis phylogenetic tree. Nonetheless, they were accumulated within a restricted group of Maculosae series, subgenus Eleocharis. The data indicates that the amplification and line-like distribution of EmaSAT14 along chromatids may have occurred recently within a section of the genus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".