MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402582058 · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c07356

pH Affects the Spontaneous Formation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> at the Air–Water Interfaces

2024· article· en· W4402582058 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Angelaki, Jil d’Erceville, D. J. Donaldson, C. George

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsChemistryHydrogen peroxideAqueous solutionRadicalSalt (chemistry)Atmosphere (unit)Inorganic chemistryHydrogenPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Recent studies have shown that the air–water interface of aqueous microdroplets is a source of OH radicals and hydrogen peroxide in the atmosphere. Several parameters such as droplet size, salt, and organic content have been suggested to play key roles in the formation of these oxidants. In this study, we focus on the effect of acidity on the spontaneous interfacial hydrogen peroxide formation of salt-containing droplets. Na 2 SO 4, NaCl, and NaBr bulk solutions, at the range of pH 4 to 9.5, were nebulized, using ultra high-purity N 2 /O 2 (80%/20%), and H 2 O 2 was measured in the collected droplets. All of the experiments were performed in T = 292 ± 1 K and humidity levels of 90 ± 2%. For Na 2 SO 4 and NaCl, the H 2 O 2 concentration was increased by ∼40% under alkaline conditions, suggesting that OH – enriched environments promote its production. When CO 2 was added in the ultrapure air, H 2 O 2 was observed to be lower at higher pH. This suggests that dissolved CO 2 can initiate reactions with OH radicals and electrons, impacting the interfacial H 2 O 2 production. H 2 O 2 formation in NaBr droplets did not display any dependence on the pH or the bath gas, showing that secondary reactions occur at the interface in the presence of Br –, which acts as an efficient interfacial source of electrons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207