MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402590492 · doi:10.1139/bcb-2024-0100

Bovine lactoferrin and chimera lactoferrin prevent and destroy <i>Salmonella</i> Typhimurium biofilms in Caco-2 cells

2024· article· en· W4402590492 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Laura E. Quintero-Martínez, Adrián Canizalez‐Román, Uriel A. Angulo‐Zamudio, Hector Flores‐Villaseñor, Jorge Velázquez-Román, Jan G.M. Bolscher, Kamran Nazmi, Nidia León‐Sicairos

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Cell Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
FundersUniversidad Autónoma de SinaloaConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsLactoferrinSalmonellaBiofilmMicrobiologyBacteriaBiologyCaco-2Salmonella entericaEnterobacteriaceaeChemistryEscherichia coliIn vitroBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Salmonellosis is a common foodborne disease caused by Salmonella bacteria. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella serotypes, such as Typhimurium, and Salmonella’s ability to form biofilms contribute to their resistance and persistence in host and non-host environments. New strategies are needed to treat or prevent Salmonella infections. This work aimed to determine the effect of the bovine lactoferrin (bLF) and lactoferrin chimera (LFchimera) in preventing or disrupting biofilms formed on abiotic surfaces or Caco-2 cells by S. Typhimurium ATCC 14028 or an MDR strain. The inhibitory activity of planktonic bacteria, prevention of biofilm formation, and destruction of biofilms of S. Typhimurium (ATCC 14028 or MDR strain) on the abiotic surface and Caco-2 cells of bLF and LFchimera were quantified by CFU/mL and visualized by microscopy using Giemsa-stained samples. bLF (75–1000 µM) and LFchimera (1–20 µM) inhibited more than 95% of S. Typhimurium planktonic growth cultures (ATCC 14028 and MDR). In addition, bLF (600, 800, and 1000 µM) and LFchimera (10 and 20 µM) prevented more than 98% of S. Typhimurium adherence and biofilm formation on Caco-2 cells. Finally, bLF (600 and 1000 µM) and LFchimera (10 and 20 µM) destroyed more than 80% of S. Typhimurium biofilms established on abiotic and Caco-2 cells. In conclusion, bLF and LFchimeras have the potential to inhibit and destroy S. Typhimurium biofilms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Cell BiologySame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207