Evaluating the Performance of a Ceiling Radiation Cooling System in a Tropical Climate
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intensification of efforts toward energy efficiency in buildings, especially in tropical regions, involves looking into the advancement of cooling systems. The combination of radiant cooling systems with air systems provides a potential way to reduce energy consumption without compromising thermal comfort. The investigation of a ceiling radiation cooling system in a tropical environment is the main objective of this work. The study used 3D modeling in SketchUp and simulations by TRNSYS software to examine the efficacy of the Radiant Ceiling Panel (RCP) in lowering the practical load with actual data from the Sustainable Energy Living Laboratory (SELL) at the University of Kuala Lumpur. The RCP system is integrated with a Fan Coil Unit (FCU) to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the RCP’s efficacy in reducing the sensible load and improving thermal comfort. To prevent condensation, the panel temperature is successfully controlled by the two-stage controller. The findings indicate that while the RCP had no effect on the latent load, it reduced the sensible load by 28%, resulting in a 20% decrease in the thermal load. The sensible load decreased from 9.47 kW to 6.84 kW. The results show the effectiveness of RCP in providing thermal comfort and reducing thermal load in tropical climates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it