MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402596350 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.17.613365

Type-II kinase inhibitors that target Parkinson’s Disease-associated LRRK2

2024· preprint· en· W4402596350 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nicolai D. Raig, Katherine J. Surridge, Marta Sanz Murillo, Verena Dederer, Andreas Krämer, Martin P. Schwalm, Lewis Elson, Deep Chatterjee, Sebastian Mathea, Thomas Hanke, Andrés E. Leschziner, Samara L. Reck‐Peterson, Stefan Knapp

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California, San DiegoNational Institutes of HealthEuropean Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and AssociationsMcGill UniversityGenentechBayerPfizerGenome CanadaMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsLRRK2Parkinson's diseaseKinaseDiseaseMedicinePharmacologyInternal medicineChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aberrant increases in kinase activity of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Numerous LRRK2-selective type-I kinase inhibitors have been developed and some have entered clinical trials. In this study, we present the first LRRK2-selective type-II kinase inhibitors. Targeting the inactive conformation of LRRK2 is functionally distinct from targeting the active-like conformation using type-I inhibitors. We designed these inhibitors using a combinatorial chemistry approach fusing selective LRRK2 type-I and promiscuous type-II inhibitors by iterative cycles of synthesis supported by structural biology and activity testing. Our current lead structures are selective and potent LRRK2 inhibitors. Through cellular assays, cryo-electron microscopy structural analysis, and in vitro motility assays, we show that our inhibitors stabilize the open, inactive kinase conformation. These new conformation-specific compounds will be invaluable as tools to study LRRK2's function and regulation, and expand the potential therapeutic options for PD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→