MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402626238 · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c11652

Blood Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 Lipid Nanoparticle mRNA Vaccine in Humans

2024· article· en· W4402626238 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stephen J. Kent, Shiyao Li, Thakshila Amarasena, Arnold Reynaldi, Wen Shi Lee, Michael G. Leeming, David H. O’Connor, Julie Nguyen, Helen E. Kent, Frank Caruso, Jennifer A. Juno, Adam K. Wheatley, Miles P. Davenport, Yi Ju

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Nano · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilUniversity of MelbourneAustralian Research CouncilUniversity of New South WalesInstitute of Infection and ImmunityDoherty Institute
KeywordsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VirologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Nanoparticle2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCoronavirusMedicineMaterials scienceNanotechnologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Outbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccines are an exciting but emerging technology used in humans. There is limited understanding of the factors that influence their biodistribution and immunogenicity. Antibodies to poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), which is on the surface of the lipid nanoparticle, are detectable in humans and boosted by human mRNA vaccination. We hypothesized that PEG-specific antibodies could increase the clearance of mRNA vaccines. To test this, we developed methods to quantify both the vaccine mRNA and ionizable lipid in frequent serial blood samples from 19 subjects receiving Moderna SPIKEVAX mRNA booster immunization. Both the vaccine mRNA and ionizable lipid peaked in blood 1–2 days post vaccination (median peak level 0.19 and 3.22 ng mL –1, respectively). The vaccine mRNA was detectable and quantifiable up to 14–15 days postvaccination in 37% of subjects. We measured the proportion of vaccine mRNA that was relatively intact in blood over time and found that the decay kinetics of the intact mRNA and ionizable lipid were identical, suggesting the intact lipid nanoparticle recirculates in blood. However, the decay rates of mRNA and ionizable lipids did not correlate with baseline levels of PEG-specific antibodies. Interestingly, the magnitude of mRNA and ionizable lipid detected in blood did correlate with the boost in the level of PEG antibodies. Furthermore, the ability of a subject’s monocytes to phagocytose lipid nanoparticles was inversely related to the rise in PEG antibodies. This suggests that the circulation of mRNA lipid nanoparticles into the blood and their clearance by phagocytes influence the PEG immunogenicity of the mRNA vaccines. Overall, this work defines the pharmacokinetics of lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccine components in human blood after intramuscular injection and the factors that influence these processes. These insights should be valuable in improving the future safety and efficacy of lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccines and therapeutics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.495

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS NanoSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207