A novel statistical approach to COVID-19 variability using the Weibull-Inverse Nadarajah Haghighi distribution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Researchers have devoted decades to striving to create a plethora of distinctive distributions in order to meet specific objectives. The argument is that traditional distributions have typically been found to lack fit in real-world situations, which include pharmaceutical studies, the field of engineering, hydrology, environmental science, and a number of others. The Weibull-inverse Nadarajah Haghighi (WINH) distribution is developed by combining the Weibull and inverse Nadarajah Haghighi distributions. The proposed distribution's fundamental characteristics have been established and analyzed. Several plots of the distributional properties, notably probability density function (PDF) with corresponding cumulative distribution function (CDF) are displayed. The estimation of model parameter is performed via the MLE procedure. Simulation-based research is conducted to demonstrate the performance of proposed estimator’s using some measure, like the average bias, variance, and associated mean square error (MSE). Two real datasets represent the morality due to COVID 19 in France and Canada are illustrated to see the practicality of the recommended model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".