Energy Efficiency Optimization for Full-Duplex D2D Communications Underlaying Distributed Antenna Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the total system energy efficiency (EE) of full-duplex (FD) device-to-device (D2D) communications underlaying distributed antenna systems (DAS), where remote access units (RAUs), D2D users (DUs), and cellular users (CUs) are all capable of FD operation. Specifically, we jointly optimize subcarrier assignment and power allocation under the quality of service (QoS) requirements of CUs and DUs and the maximum power constraints of RAUs, CUs, and DUs. In addition, we propose a novel spectrum sharing strategy that allows each subcarrier to be assigned to multiple CUs and/or multiple D2D pairs (DPs) for flexibility. To solve the formulated non-convex optimization problem, we first employ fractional programming to transform the objective function in the optimization problem from the fractional form into the equivalent subtractive form. Then, an efficient iterative resource allocation algorithm is proposed, which needs to solve an inner problem in each iteration. After relaxing the variables and introducing penalty factors, the non-convex inner problem is transformed into a convex problem through the successive convex approximation (SCA) method and solved by iterative algorithm. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can considerably improve the system EE compared to other benchmark schemes. Furthermore, the proposed spectrum sharing strategy is superior to the existing sharing strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".