MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402635766 · doi:10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100138

The overall outcome of aortoduodenal syndrome following endovascular vs open surgical interventions

2024· article· en· W4402635766 on OpenAlexaffabout
Turki A. AlAmoudi, Arwa H. Ibrahim, Lubna AlMaawali, Turki AlTuraifi, Ahmed Afandi, Hassan AlZahrani, Abdullah M. Abdullah, Reda Jamjoom

Bibliographic record

VenueJVS-Vascular Insights · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic aneurysm repair treatments
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionMedicineIntensive care medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective Aortoduodenal syndrome (ADS) is a direct compression of an abdominal aortic aneurysm against the superior mesenteric artery or the abdominal wall, causing mechanical bowel obstruction. The first such case was reported by Canadian Professor William Osler in 1905. This clinical condition is mainly treated surgically to relieve the obstruction either by open aneurysm repair or gastrointestinal bypasses and, recently, by endovascular interventions. This systematic review aimed to assess the outcomes of different interventions in terms of symptomatic improvement thoroughly, peri- and post-intervention aneurysmal size, and overall survival rates. Methods Google Scholar, Pubmed, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched by two independent reviewers to collect case reports and short case series on aortodudenal syndrome written in English and published from January 2000 to July 2023. Results This review was conducted on 28 articles published from 2001 to 2023, with a total of 30 cases included. The mean age of the patients was 73.76 ± 7.7 years; nausea and vomiting (97%), abdominal pain (73%), abdominal distention (63%) were the most common symptoms among presentation. Twenty-four patients (80%) had comorbidities; only 7 of them were known to have abdominal aortic aneurysm. The aneurysmal sac at presentation ranged from 3.8 to 11.0 cm, with a mean size of 7.2 ± 2.2 cm. Eleven patients (36.7%) underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), and 17 patients (56.7%) had open aortic repair, and 2 patients (6.6%) had a gastrointestinal bypass, either gastrojejunostomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The size of the aneurysmal sac was reported for eight patients who underwent EVAR ranging from 3.8 to 11.0 cm with a mean size of 7.27 ± 2.65 cm before the intervention; after the intervention, the mean size was 6.48 ± 2.26 cm. Mortality was reported in two patients; one underwent gastrojejunostomy and the other underwent EVAR. Conclusions Aortoduodenal syndrome remains a rare condition; the choice of surgical intervention is affected by patient factors, surgeon experience, and resource availability. That necessitates tailoring a management plan for each patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJVS-Vascular InsightsSame topicAortic aneurysm repair treatmentsFrench-language works237,207