Exact methods and a variable neighborhood search for the robust capacitated <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si3.svg" display="inline" id="d1e3028"> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> </mml:math> -median problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The capacitated p -median problem (CPMP) involves placing p identical facilities in a network and assigning customer nodes to these facilities to satisfy all customer demands with minimal transportation costs. In practical applications, demand and distance parameters are often uncertain during the planning process, leading to infeasible or excessively costly solutions if these uncertainties are disregarded. This paper addresses the robust CPMP (RCPMP), which incorporates demand uncertainty into the problem using the robust optimization paradigm. We propose a general framework to model and solve the RCPMP, considering different polyhedral uncertainty sets, namely the cardinality-constrained and the knapsack sets. We develop exact approaches encompassing compact models, different families of valid inequalities, and branch-and-cut and branch-and-price algorithms, exploring both implemented uncertainty sets and problem structure. Furthermore, we implement an efficient Variable Neighborhood Search (VNS) heuristic to solve these robust variants, which incorporates state-of-the-art algorithms, parallelization techniques, and optimized data structures. Computational experiments using adapted benchmark instances with up to 400 nodes indicate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches. The results show that using parallelization and hash tables within the VNS heuristic promotes significant performance improvements and yields near-optimal solutions for most instances, as well as outperforming the exact approaches in several instances where the optimal solution was not found. Moreover, these results highlight the benefits of using robust solutions in practical settings, especially when considering different uncertainty sets to generate solutions with advantageous trade-offs between cost and risk. • Robust counterparts of the capacitated p-median problem under demand uncertainty. • We consider the cardinality-constrained and knapsack uncertainty sets. • Compact formulations, branch-and-cut, and branch-and-price algorithms for the problem. • Efficient variable neighborhood search with enhanced data structure and parallelization. • Robust solutions reduce risk significantly and provide interesting managerial insights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".