MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402640196 · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08461-7

Rapid normalization of vitamin D deficiency in PICU (VITdALIZE-KIDS): study protocol for a phase III, multicenter randomized controlled trial

2024· article· en· W4402640196 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Katie O’Hearn, Kusum Menon, Lisa Albrecht, Karin Amrein, Philip Britz‐McKibbin, Florence Cayouette, Karen Choong, Jennifer Foster, Dean Fergusson, Alejandro Floh, Patrícia S. Fontela, Pavel Geier, Elaine Gilfoyle, Gonzalo Garcia Guerra, Anna Gunz, Erick Helmeczi, Ali Khamessan, Ari R. Joffe, Laurie Lee, Lauralyn McIntyre, Srinivas Murthy, Simon Parsons, Tim Ramsay, Lindsay M. Ryerson, Marisa Tucci, James Dayre McNally

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of CalgaryChildren’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of AlbertaWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoMcGill UniversityUniversity of OttawaMcGill University Health CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenOttawa HospitalStollery Children's HospitalAlberta Children's HospitalIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie UniversityMcMaster Children's HospitalMcMaster UniversityUniversité LavalChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGroupe canadien de recherche en soins intensifs
KeywordsMedicineProtocol (science)Randomized controlled trialNormalization (sociology)BioinformaticsPediatricsInternal medicineAlternative medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The rate of vitamin D deficiency (VDD) in critically ill children worldwide has been estimated at 50%. These children are at risk of multiple organ dysfunction, chronic morbidity, and decreased health related quality of life (HRQL). Pediatric and adult ICU clinical trials suggest that VDD is associated with worse clinical outcomes, although data from supplementation trials are limited and inconclusive. Our group's phase II multicenter dose evaluation pilot study established the efficacy and safety of an enteral weight-based cholecalciferol loading dose to rapidly restore vitamin D levels in critically ill children. METHODS: Our aim is to evaluate the impact of this dosing regimen on clinical outcomes. VITdALIZE-KIDS is a pragmatic, phase III, multicenter, double-blind RCT aiming to randomize 766 critically ill children from Canadian PICUs. Participants are randomized using a 1:1 scheme to receive a single dose at enrollment of enteral cholecalciferol (10,000 IU/kg, max 400,000 IU) or placebo. Eligibility criteria include critically ill children aged newborn (> 37 weeks corrected gestational age) to < 18 years who have blood total 25-hydroxyvitamin D < 50 nmol/L. The primary objective is to determine if rapid normalization of vitamin D status improves HRQL at 28 days following enrollment. The secondary objective is to evaluate the impact of rapid normalization of vitamin D status on multiple organ dysfunction. The study includes additional tertiary outcomes including functional status, HRQL and mortality at hospital discharge and 90 days, PICU and hospital length of stay, and adverse events related to vitamin D toxicity. Additionally, we are performing comprehensive vitamin D speciation and non-targeted metabolite profiling as part of a sub-study for the first 100 participants from whom an enrollment and at least one post-intervention blood and urine sample were obtained. DISCUSSION: The VITdALIZE-KIDS trial is the first phase III, multicenter trial to evaluate whether rapid normalization of vitamin D status could represent a simple, inexpensive, and safe means of improving outcomes following pediatric critical illness. Recruitment was initiated in June 2019 and is expected to continue to March 2026. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03742505. Study first submitted on November 12, 2018 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03742505.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.495
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207