MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402641163 · doi:10.1113/jp286962

Lactate increases ADAM10 activity and reduces BACE1 activity in mouse brain

2024· article· en· W4402641163 on OpenAlexafffund
Isabel Moberg, Seth F. McCarthy, Sarah Bellaflor, Michael S. Finch, Tom J. Hazell, Rebecca E. K. MacPherson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityWilfrid Laurier University
FundersBrock UniversityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWilfrid Laurier University
KeywordsADAM10NeuroscienceChemistryPremovement neuronal activityBrain activity and meditationInternal medicineBiologyMedicineBiochemistryElectroencephalographyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The accumulation and aggregation of beta‐amyloid (Aβ) peptides contributes to neuronal dysfunction and death. These Aβ peptides originate from a transmembrane protein known as amyloid precursor protein (APP), which can be processed via two competing pathways. Alpha‐secretase (ADAM10) cleavage is thought to be neuroprotective while beta‐secretase (BACE1) cleavage results in the production of Aβ. Aerobic exercise reduces BACE1 activity, but the mechanisms involved are unknown though several exercise‐induced mediators such as lactate may be involved. The current study examined whether systemic lactate can alter APP processing and BACE1 and ADAM10 activity. Mice were randomly assigned to one of four groups ( n = 10 per group): (1) sedentary; (2) lactate‐injection (1.0 g kg −1 body mass); (3) exercise; and (4) exercise and oxamate (lactate dehydrogenase inhibitor; 750 mg kg −1 body mass). Two hours following intervention, the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (PFC) were collected. In the PFC lactate‐injection and exercise resulted in higher ADAM10 activity compared to sedentary (exercise P = 0.0215, lactate P = 0.0038), in the hippocampus lactate‐injection was higher compared to sedentary (lactate P = 0.011), and this was absent in the presence of oxamate. Hippocampal BACE1 activity was lower in the lactate group compared to the exercise group ( P = 0.01). Oxamate resulted in higher BACE1 protein content compared to sedentary in the PFC ( vs . sedentary P = 0.048). These findings suggest that lactate is important for regulating ADAM10 activity and thereby shifts APP processing away from Aβ production. image Key points Exercise is known to alter the processing of amyloid precursor protein by reducing the activity of the rate‐limiting enzyme BACE1 and increasing the activity of ADAM10. It is thought that exercise‐induced factors are responsible for these enzymatic changes. This study examined if lactate accumulation plays a role in this process. Mice were assigned to one of four groups: sedentary, lactate, exercise and exercise + lactate. The findings demonstrate that lactate accumulation alters brain BACE1 and ADAM10 and shifts amyloid precursor protein processing away from beta‐amyloid production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNeuropeptides and Animal PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207