MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402653974 · doi:10.1177/17474930241288033

Sex, gender, and stroke recovery: Functional limitations and inpatient care needs in Canadian and European survivors

2024· article· en· W4402653974 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Yusheng Zhou, Teresa Gisinger, Simon David Lindner, Valeria Raparelli, Colleen M. Norris, Alexandra Kautzky‐Willer, Louise Pilote

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Stroke · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsHeart and Stroke FoundationAlberta Health ServicesAlberta HealthUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchVetenskapsrådetSvenska Forskningsrådet Formas
KeywordsMedicineActivities of daily livingMarital statusSocioeconomic statusGerontologyStroke (engine)Quality of life (healthcare)DemographyLogistic regressionMultivariate analysisInstitutionalisationPopulationEnvironmental healthPhysical therapyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability among survivors. Past literature already investigated the biological sex differences in stroke outcome; still limited work on gender differences is published. Therefore, the study aimed at investigating whether biological sex and sociocultural gender of survivors play a role as determinants of disability and quality of life among stroke survivors across Europe and Canada. METHODS: Data were gathered from the European Health Information Survey (EHIS, n = 316,333) and Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS, n = 127,462) data sets. Main outcomes of interest were disability, assessed through evaluating the impairment of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL), and inpatient care needs, such as hospitalization or institutionalization. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to identify factors independently associated with outcomes. Federated analysis was conducted for cross-country comparisons. Data were adjusted for the country-specific Gender Inequality Index (GII), with higher score corresponding to more gender inequality toward females. RESULTS: Female survivors showed greater impairments in iADL (odds ratio [OR] = 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.53-1.96) and ADL (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.09-1.44), without a corresponding increase in inpatient care needs. Socioeconomic factors such as marital status and income level were significant predictors of disability, with low income and being single/divorced associated with higher risks. The impact of sex was more pronounced in countries with higher GII, indicating the influence of gender inequality on stroke outcomes. INTERPRETATION: The findings highlight the significant impact of biological sex and gender-related social determinants on post stroke disability, with female sex and unfavorable socioeconomic conditions being associated with worse outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of StrokeSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207