Assessing The Influence Of Work Of Breathing On Sex-differences In Inspiratory Muscle Activation During Exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During exercise, the activation of ‘extra-diaphragmatic’ inspiratory muscles (e.g., the scalenes and sternocleidomastoids) is higher in females than in males for a given absolute or relative minute ventilation (V̇E). The effect of sex on inspiratory muscle activation could be due to sex-differences in the work of breathing (WB), sex-differences in the shape of the ribcage, or both. Although altering ribcage geometry is not feasible, the WB can be manipulated acutely during exercise. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of WB and sex on inspiratory muscle activation during exercise in healthy males and females. METHODS: n = 11 healthy adults (n = 6 females, n = 5 males) completed two days of testing, each involving pulmonary function testing and an incremental exercise test to exhaustion while breathing either atmospheric air or normoxic helium-oxygen gas (i.e., 21% oxygen, 79% helium) to reduce the WB. At rest and throughout exercise, the WB was quantified using esophageal manometry and open-circuit spirometry, activation of the diaphragm (EMGDI) was measured using a multipair esophageal electrode catheter, and activation of the scalene (EMGSCA) and sternocleidomastoid (EMGSCM) muscle were measured using bipolar skin surface electrodes. RESULTS: During exercise while breathing atmospheric air, females had a higher WB for a given V̇E ≥ 60 l·min-1 than males (p < 0.01); however, breathing helium-oxygen gas during exercise reduced the WB in females to a similar level than their male counterparts breathing atmospheric air (p = 0.925). Despite having a similar WB at a V̇E of 70 ± 5 l·min-1 during exercise, females breathing helium-oxygen gas had a higher EMGSCA and EMGSCM (both p < 0.05), but a similar EMGDI (p = 0.910), than males breathing atmospheric air. CONCLUSION: The persistence of sex-differences in ‘extra-diaphragmatic’ inspiratory muscle activation during exercise after accounting for male-female differences in the WB suggests that morphological factors, such as ribcage geometry, may partially contribute to sex-differences in scalene and sternocleidomastoid activation during exercise. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2020-06564) and Research Manitoba (5409) operating grants
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".