MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Investigating Premotor Cortical And Motoneuronal Excitability In Fast And Slow Voluntary Contractions Of The Elbow Flexors

2024· article· en· W4402662249 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel C. Basile, Michael T. Paris, Chris J. McNeil, Charles L. Rice

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusYork UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroscienceElbowPsychologyAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corticospinal excitability (CSE) increases prior to a voluntary contraction; however the contributions of cortical and spinal mechanisms are not well understood. It is also unknown whether the intended contractile rate affects the change in CSE. PURPOSE: To assess premotor cortical and motoneuronal excitability prior to fast (ballistic) vs. slow (ramp) contractions. METHODS: Eighteen young, healthy participants (9 M; 9F) were positioned supine with the non-dominant arm flexed to ∼90° at the elbow joint. They completed 72 isometric elbow flexion contractions targeting 50% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) torque. In a randomized order, contractions were completed at a fast (as fast as possible) and slow (25% MVC/s) contractile rate. Participants were also cued to contract with warning (red) and “GO” (green) visual signals. Stimulation was applied over the motor cortex, corticospinal tract, and brachial plexus to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary evoked potentials (CMEPs), and M-waves, respectively, in the surface electromyogram (EMG) recorded over the biceps brachii. With the muscle relaxed, stimulation intensities elicited MEPs and CMEPs of ~10% maximal M-wave (Mmax). MEPs and CMEPs were collected at 0, 25, 50 and 75% of premotor reaction time (RT) following the “GO” signal. Baseline MEPs and CMEPs were elicited at rest between trials, without being preceded by the visual signals. Cortical and motoneuronal excitability were evaluated by ratios of MEP/CMEP and CMEP/Mmax amplitude at 0, 25, 50, 75% RT compared to resting baseline. RESULTS: CMEP/Mmax amplitude was 45% greater in the ballistic condition (p < 0.001) and 42% greater in the ramp condition at 0% RT (p < 0.001) compared to baseline. CMEP/Mmax amplitude increased progressively closer to EMG onset, reaching 63% greater than baseline in the ballistic condition (p < 0.001) and 64% greater in the ramp condition at 75% RT (p < 0.001). Normalized to the CMEP, there were no differences in MEP amplitudes from baseline in either contractile condition across all RT points (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that increases in premotor CSE are mediated by spinal mechanisms rather than cortical mechanisms. Furthermore, the increase in premotor CSE does not appear to be influenced by the intended contractile rate. Supported by NSERC. NSERC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicMuscle activation and electromyography studies→French-language works237,207→