MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Resistance Training And Muscle Maintenance In A Pancreatic Cancer Pilot Study

2024· article· en· W4402662634 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nathan H. Parker, An Ngo‐Huang, Ye-Rang Ju, Carol Harrison, Karen Basen‐Engquist, Matthew H. G. Katz

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistance trainingPancreatic cancerCancerMedicineTraining (meteorology)Resistance (ecology)Physical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyInternal medicineBiologyGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Muscle maintenance is an important target to improve wellbeing and treatment tolerance following pancreatic cancer (PC) diagnosis. We examined muscle maintenance among PC patients participating in a home-based, tele-supervised resistance training (tele-RT) program. METHODS: Tele-RT spanned 2-4 months between clinical staging visits during or following treatment. Duration varied with treatment context. Sessions (approximately 45 min, 2x/week) targeted major muscle groups with 2 sets (10-12 repetitions) of 6 exercises using resistance tubes and handles: Squat, deadlift, chest press, row, lateral raise, and abdominal stabilization. Sessions were supervised by certified trainers via video conferences (Zoom, San Jose, CA) with progression based on perceived exertion. Skeletal muscle cross-sectional area (SMA) at the midpoint of the 3rd lumbar vertebra) was quantified using SliceOmatic (Tomovision, Magog, Canada) and computerized tomography (CT) images from clinical staging visits at enrollment (T0) and post-program follow-up (T1). RESULTS: 25 patients enrolled [56% female, median age 66 (range 43-82)]. Treatment contexts varied, with 6 patients (24%) undergoing chemotherapy for stage III-IV PC, 5 (20%) undergoing preoperative chemotherapy for stage I-II PC, 2 (8%) undergoing postoperative chemotherapy, and 12 (48%) in postoperative surveillance with no concurrent treatment. 16 patients (64%) completed at least 75% of possible sessions. 4 patients (16%; all with stage III-IV PC) dropped out due to worsening symptoms from disease progression, and 1 patient (postoperative surveillance) dropped out due to scheduling. Including all patients, there was no significant change in SMA (cm2) from T0 to T1 [mean (SD) 135.9 (34.1) vs. 134.2 (33.7), t(24)=.72, p=.5). There was a significant positive correlation between total session completion and percent SMA change [r(23)=.58, p=.002]. The 16 patients who completed at least 75% of possible sessions trended toward favorable percent SMA change compared to the 9 patients who did not [mean (SD) +1.5% (6.7) vs. -5.1% (9.4), t(23)=-1.99, p=.06]. CONCLUSIONS: Tele-RT offers promising potential to maintain or increase muscle mass following PC diagnosis but requires additional strategies to improve retention and adherence across treatment contexts. MD Anderson Cancer Center Survivorship Seed Grant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicNutrition and Health in Aging→French-language works237,207→