MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Management of a Full Thickness Achilles Tendon Rupture

2024· article· en· W4402662688 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alex James, Mohammad Chand Jamali

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAchilles tendonTendonAchilles tendon ruptureMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HPI: Our patient is a middle-aged female with ankle pain for 3 months found to have sustained a full Achilles tendon rupture. She underwent surgery with Haglund’s resection six weeks later. Her post -op management included modified weight bearing, CAM boot, home physical therapy, and outpatient rehab. She presented to the ER a month after surgery with increased leg pain and a failure of oral antibiotics for post-surgical cellulitis. She was admitted with a tentative diagnosis of cellulitis which required a PICC line for antibiotic therapy. PMH showed she suffered from chronic lower backpain, opioid abuse, tobacco use disorder for 40 years, elevated BMI, arthritis, hypertension, attention deficit disorder, cervical radiculopathy. She reported to ED frequently because she did not have a PCP at the time. Patient's education level and family support were unavailable. DIAGNOSIS, MANAGEMENT, OUTCOME: PE: hemodynamically stable patient with warm, tender erythematous left leg up to the mid-calf and shin with flaky and dry skin. Differential: enthesitis within the setting of ciprofloxacin use, gastrocnemius rupture, cellulitis, partial Achilles re-rupture, poor post-operative compliance, DVT, compartment syndrome, ankle fracture. Final Diagnosis: post-op cellulitis/Achilles re-rupture. Diagnostics: pre-op MRI Ankle, post-op CT Tibia, laboratory studies; CT Tib/Fib showed fluid collection on the periphery of the tendon suggestive of cellulitis and partial re-rupture. Ottawa ankle rules did not suggest a need for X-Ray. Lab testing showed a WBC of 14.7, Hg of 10.7, no electrolyte or coagulation abnormalities. Outcomes: initial management was surgery; patient’s post-op complications were managed with antibiotics and surgical debridement. We used a PDDM to determine the primary drivers of pain and disability that most likely contributed to a suboptimal outcome consisting of five domains: 1) nociceptive, 2) nervous system dysfunction, 3) comorbidity, 4) cognitive-affective, 5) contextual drivers. We constructed a radar plot to determine how each individual factor plays a role in patient outcome. Comorbidities, plausible low health literacy, poor compliance with medical advice and other social and contextual factors must be considered whenever complications and protracted recovery are observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207